L’art. 216, co.1, nr. 2 l.f. “envisages two alternative cases: that of theft or destruction of books and other accounting records; that of keeping accounts in such a way as to make it impossible to reconstruct the movement of the bankrupt's business and assets". To certain....
The hypothesis of failure to keep accounting records can fall within the scope of documentary bankruptcy, but only if it is ascertained that the purpose of the omission was to cause harm to creditors, given that otherwise it would be impossible to distinguish this case from that one, similar from a material point of view, Preview...
The aggravation of the instability punished by art. 217, co. 1, n. 4, The aggravation of the instability punished by art, it must consist in deterioration, The aggravation of the instability punished by art, The aggravation of the instability punished by art. The psychological element of gross negligence can be inferred not on the basis of mere ....
On the subject of bankruptcy crimes, art. 216, co. 1, n. 2, L.F. it sets up two distinct hypotheses of fraudulent documentary bankruptcy. The first consists in subtraction, destruction or falsification of the scriptures and is characterized by the specific intent to procure an unjust for himself or others ...
On the subject of bankruptcy crimes, art. 216, co. 1, n. 2, L.F. it sets up two distinct hypotheses of fraudulent documentary bankruptcy. The first consists in subtraction, destruction or falsification of the scriptures and is characterized by the specific intent to procure an unjust for himself or others ...
On the subject of fraudulent asset bankruptcy, if the fact refers to relationships between companies belonging to the same group, the offense must be considered non-existent only if the indirect benefits for the bankrupt company prove capable of effectively compensating for the immediately negative effects and are ...