Process suspension with probation is an alternative way of defining the process, activated from the preliminary investigation stage, through which it is possible to reach a ruling of acquittal for extinction of the crime, where the trial period you access...
Process suspension with probation is an alternative way of defining the process, activated from the preliminary investigation stage, through which it is possible to reach a ruling of acquittal for extinction of the crime, where the probationary period accessed by the suspect /...
The oral evidence in criminal proceedings is taken through the cross-examination of the witness, ie the set of rules by which the parties may ask questions directly and orally to the heads. At the Judge has the direct control about the form, having the Judicial ...
The oral evidence in criminal proceedings is taken through the cross-examination of the witness, ie the set of rules by which the parties may ask questions directly and orally to the heads. At the Judge has the direct control about the form, having the Judicial ...
The oral evidence in criminal proceedings is taken through the cross-examination of the witness, ie the set of rules by which the parties may ask questions directly and orally to the heads. At the Judge has the direct control about the form, having the Judicial ...
On the issue of test, the alibi failed to be considered as an element completely agnostic in terms of evidence and, therefore, which has not been even a hint; only in the case in which it was acquired aliunde proof of the responsibility it may constitute a supplementary element, of closing the evidentiary construct....
With regard to the acquisition of the statements made during preliminary investigations in the hearing file, art. 500, co. 4, c.p.p. (according to which the statements contained in the file of the public prosecutor previously made by the witness are acquired in the file of the trial) also applies to ...
On the issue of test, the alibi failed to be considered as an element completely agnostic in terms of evidence and, therefore, which has not been even a hint; only in the case in which it was acquired aliunde proof of the responsibility it may constitute a supplementary element, closing date.
The oral evidence in criminal proceedings is taken through the cross-examination of the witness, ie the set of rules by which the parties may ask questions directly and orally to the heads. At the Judge has the direct control about the form, having the Judicial ...
The judge's offensive power to order the taking of new means of proof, exercised in the pursuit of the interest of the search for truth in view of the punishment of criminally sanctioned conduct, finds no limitation in the device power of the procedural parties; it can also be exercised for taking evidence ...